By Michael J. Vlach
@mikevlach
This
entry is Part 5 concerning what Jesus meant in Matthew 5:17-19. My focus here
specifically is on what Jesus meant by “these commandments” in Matthew 5:19.
This verse reads:
Whoever then annuls one
of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called
least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the
kingdom of heaven.
Jesus makes two key points here. First, anyone
who “annuls one of the least of these commandments” will be called “least in
the kingdom of heaven.” Second, whoever “keeps and teaches” the “least of these
commandments” will be called great in the kingdom. Since Jesus’ message
involves one’s status in the kingdom of God, getting “these commandments” right
is important.
The word for “annuls” comes from luō which often means “loose,” “set
free,” “dissolve,” or “destroy.” In this context, “annuls” probably means to
“to do away with.” If one does away with “the least of these commandments” they
can expect a lower position in the kingdom.
The word for “keeps” is poieō. Of the 581 uses of poieō
in the New Testament the dominant meaning is related to “does” or “doing.”
There are also a variety of nuances of this term based on context. Since this
term is paired against “annuls” the meaning here is probably that of
“establishes” or “does”. Thus, the one who is great in the kingdom is one who “establishes”
or “does” “these commandments.”
But what are “these commandments” Jesus refers
to? The word for “commandments” is entolē,
which can be translated as “command,” “commandment,” “order,” “instruction,” or
“precept.” This term in 5:19 differs from Jesus’ two uses of nomos (“Law”) in Matthew 5:17-18. This
shift from nomos to entolē may or may not be significant. Is
Jesus using entolē as a synonym for nomos or is He using entolē to contrast His teachings with
“the Law”? Context will determine which understanding is more accurate.
There are three options for understanding “these
commandments” in Matthew 5:19. First, “these commandments” could refer specifically
to the commands of the Mosaic Law. This view, which is held by many, is
based on the belief that Jesus’ second use of “Law” in Matthew 5:18 refers specifically
to the commands of the Mosaic Law. Thus, keeping “the least of these
commandments” means keeping all of the Mosaic Law commands.
Second, another view is that “these commandments”
refers to the Old Testament as a whole, including its principles and
prophecies. If Jesus is referring back to verse 18, this view is possible. If
“Law” in 5:18 referred to the Old Testament as a whole, then “keeping” and “teaching”
“these commandments” could refer to keeping and teaching the instructions,
principles, and predictions of the Old Testament.
One thing to note about Views 1 and 2 above is
that they both assert that “these commandments” in 5:19 point back to the “Law”
of 5:18. The third view discussed below is different in that it anticipates
what Jesus will say starting in 5:21 through chapter 7.
A
third view is that “these commandments” refers to Jesus’ instructions in the
Sermon on the Mount of Matthew 5-7, particularly what He says from 5:21 through
chapter 7 where many commands are given. The Sermon of Matthew 5-7 is full
of commands from Jesus and perhaps that is what Jesus refers to. Particularly
significant is Jesus’ statements at the end of the Sermon concerning “these
words of Mine” and the “authority” He possesses:
“Therefore everyone who hears these words of Mine and acts on them, may be compared to
a wise man who built his house on the rock” (Matt. 7:24).
“Everyone who hears these
words of Mine and does not act on them, will be like a foolish man who
built his house on the sand” (Matt. 7:26).
When Jesus had finished these words, the crowds were
amazed at His teaching; for He was teaching them as one having
authority, and not as their scribes (Matt. 7:28-29).
This
third option asserts that “these commandments” of 5:19 is the same as “these
words of Mine” in 7:24, 26, which encompass the entire sermon of Jesus. If this
view is accurate, Jesus is not pointing back to the “Law or the Prophets” of
5:17-18 in 5:19, but He is emphasizing His own authoritative commands in
Matthew 5-7, particularly beginning at 5:21. Starting with 5:21 Jesus offers
many commands and instructions. Thus, “these commandments” in 5:19 could refer
to Jesus’ New covenant instruction as the Messiah. This view is consistent with
the idea that Jesus is not “explaining” Moses, but is offering His
authoritative New covenant instruction for the new era in Him.
These
three views can be summarized as follows with the arrows meaning “refers to”:
The Law (Mosaic
Law) ←
These
commandments
The Law or the
Prophets (Old Testament) ← These commandments
These commandments
→ Jesus’ commandments in Matthew 5-7
So which of the three views mentioned above is
most accurate? The first view concerning keeping Mosaic Law commandments is
unlikely since Jesus’ use of “Law” in 5:18 is most likely shorthand for “the
Law or the Prophets” mentioned in 5:17, which refers to the Old Testament as a
whole, not just the Mosaic Law. Mosaic covenant instruction is too narrow in
this context. Plus, with Jesus’ six “But I say to you” statements in 5:21-48,
Jesus seems to be asserting His superior instruction as the Messiah. In
addition, there are major theological problems with asserting that all commands
of the Mosaic Law must be kept after Jesus’ first coming. If Jesus is referring
specifically to the Mosaic Law, this seems to be an affirmation that all 613
commands of the Mosaic Law, including all the civil and ceremonial aspects of
the Mosaic Law, must be kept by His followers. This idea seems to be refuted by
much teaching in the New Testament (see 2 Cor. 3:6-11; Hebrews 8-10).
The best answer lies with either View 2 or View
3. Concerning View 2, the near context of “these commandments” in 5:19 with
“the Law or the Prophets” in 5:17-18 shows Jesus could be referring back to the
Old Testament as a whole. This view is possible.
View 3 is also very possible. If one looks at the
Sermon as a whole, Jesus is giving His authoritative
instruction for His followers. He does not seem to be pointing back to
Moses; instead, He is asserting His authority, which clearly is noted in
Matthew 5:21-48 and 7:24, 26. So, “the least of these commandments” could point forward to what follows starting in 5:21 through chapter 7. If accurate, this
understanding would be similar to Jesus’ statement in John 14:15: “If you love
Me you will keep my commandments [entolē].”
If this third view is correct, then Jesus’ message
in Matthew 5:17-19 is that He is the King and greater Moses (see Deut.
18:15-18) who is giving new instruction for His followers. But in contrast to
the claim of His enemies, this new instruction is not contrary to what the Old
Testament taught. A person cannot rightly claim that he is following the Hebrew
scriptures while also rejecting Jesus and His teachings since Jesus and His
words are in perfect harmony with the Law and the Prophets. Every single thing the
Old Testament taught must come to pass, including the reality that the Messiah
would bring a better New covenant (see Jeremiah 30-33).
In the end, it is a close call between Views 2
and 3. I give preference to View 3 and its assertion that “these commandments”
refers to Jesus’ instructions in the Sermon on the Mount of Matthew 5-7. I believe this because Jesus
emphasizes His authority in 5:21-48 and the sermon ends with an emphasis on
Jesus’ words (see Matt. 7:24, 26).
Excellent study. I really like view 3. Wow.
ReplyDeleteThank you Jeff!
ReplyDeleteMuch appreciated. Reposting at SharperIron.org this week.
ReplyDeleteThank you Aaron.
DeleteThis is so so helpful, thank you Mike! I've been studying this out for the last couple of weeks after beginning a series on the Sabbath. I'm landing at the moment on view 2, but am super super grateful for this whole series of blog posts you've done. You've articulated much better than I could have done exactly where my own thinking had been going, and given me much extra help along the way. So grateful for your labours.
ReplyDeleteTom, thanks for the comment and for interacting with this series.
ReplyDeleteHi,
ReplyDeleteJust a layman here, but my concern with view 3 is that of verse 20. In your book you identify the righteous of the Pharisees rightly as an outward, hypocritical righteousness. You derive that conclusion, rightly, from the greater understanding of the Pharisees in Scripture. However, in my understanding of the passage that is the primary thrust. Jesus is shocking the people when He says the Pharisees are not righteous enough (leaving them wondering who then is righteous enough) and thus proving that by unveiling to them a proper understanding of the law to them. If Jesus is simply introducing a new law, that changes the emphasis of the passage and working backwards back to the contrast of righteousness; the contrast of Mosaic Law and New Covenant Law is what sets the Pharisee’s righteousness in deficiency. It seems to me that your view leaves the righteousness of the Pharisees as deficient not because of hypocrisy but because it was tied to the Mosaic Law and not the New Covenant law/beefed up Mosaic Law/Law of Christ. Clearly, you teach that we are saved by grace through faith alone, but your understanding in this passage would seem to contradict that. I would greatly appreciate if you could elucidate where I have erred in my reasoning.
God bless,
Mike
If you do end up seeing this and responding I really don’t understand how the blogosphere works could you be so kind as to email it to mikepazu@yahoo.com. Thanks
DeleteIf you do end up seeing this and responding I really don’t understand how the blogosphere works could you be so kind as to email it to mikepazu@yahoo.com. Thanks
ReplyDeletesteroid satın al
ReplyDeleteheets
ON33
izmir
ReplyDeleteizmit
karabük
karaman
kars
QULB